Linos NEWS

ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini: How the Top AI Assistants Compare in 2025

OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google's flagship AI assistants differ on pricing, context length, and strengths. Here's how ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini stack up in 2025.

Linos NEWS Updated February 7, 2026 4 min read
Three AI assistant icons representing ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini on a dark blue gradient
Three AI assistant icons representing ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini on a dark blue gradient

Shoppers comparing ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini face three distinct products: OpenAI's conversational and creative ChatGPT, Anthropic's long-context and safety-focused Claude, and Google's Gemini with deep search and Workspace integration. All three offer free tiers and paid subscriptions around $20 per month; choice depends on whether you need coding depth, huge documents, or ecosystem tie-ins.

Background: How We Got Here

OpenAI released ChatGPT in November 2022 and quickly set the standard for consumer AI chatbots. Anthropic launched Claude in early 2023 with a focus on safety and long-context reasoning. Google rebranded its Bard assistant as Gemini in late 2023 and has since rolled out Gemini Advanced and deeper integration with Workspace. By 2025, all three vendors ship multiple models: lightweight options for speed and cost, and flagship models for complex tasks. Independent benchmarks and reviewer comparisons (including PCMag, DataStudios, and Intuition Labs) consistently rank these three at the top for general use.

What Each Assistant Does Best

ChatGPT (OpenAI) leads on general knowledge, creative writing, and multimodal features. Subscribers get image and video generation, a 1 million-token context option with GPT-4.1 for developers, and a dual-mode "Thinking" model that switches between fast and deep reasoning. PCMag and other reviewers have named it Editors' Choice for AI chatbots. GPT-4.1 scores highest on broad knowledge benchmarks. OpenAI has also integrated search and real-time data in paid tiers.

Claude (Anthropic) excels at long documents and step-by-step reasoning. It handles up to 200,000 tokens in a single context and is tuned for coding tasks and nuanced instruction-following. Anthropic emphasizes safety and steerability; Claude often shows its reasoning more explicitly. It is a strong choice for analysis of large reports, legal or technical drafts, and code. Paid tiers run from about $17–20 per month (Pro) up to $200 per month (Team or high-usage plans). Claude 4, released in May 2025, added agent-style capabilities and better tool use.

Gemini (Google) ties into Gmail, Drive, Docs, and YouTube. Gemini Advanced subscribers get the Pro-grade model with a large context window and adaptive reasoning. Google positions Gemini for research and productivity inside its ecosystem; it can summarize emails, draft in Docs, and answer over video. Enterprise pricing runs around $30 per user per month. Gemini 2.5 Flash is widely available; Gemini 2.5 Pro is the premium option in Gemini Advanced.

Pricing and API Costs

Consumer subscriptions cluster around $20 per month for pro access. OpenAI charges $20 for ChatGPT Plus and $200 for higher-tier Pro. Anthropic's Claude Pro is about $17–20 per month; Google's Gemini Advanced is in the same range. For API use, OpenAI's GPT-4.1 runs roughly $3–12 per million tokens depending on tier. Claude's top Opus tier is more expensive (around $15 input and $75 output per million tokens); mid-tier Sonnet is closer to $3 input and $15 output. Gemini 2.5 Pro is often cheaper (about $1.25 input and $10 output per million tokens). Anthropic offers prompt caching to cut repeat context costs; Google and OpenAI have their own optimizations for long contexts.

Key Details: Context, Coding, and Ecosystem

  • Context: Claude and Gemini offer very large context windows; ChatGPT matches with 1M-token options in higher tiers. Long research documents, codebases, and legal drafts favor Claude or Gemini for single-session analysis.
  • Coding: Claude and ChatGPT lead in coding assistance; Claude is often cited for clearer step-by-step logic and refactoring. Both support multiple languages and can generate tests and docs.
  • Creativity and images: ChatGPT includes DALL-E and video tools in-app; Claude and Gemini have varying multimodal support and may rely on separate image tools.
  • Ecosystem: Gemini wins for Google Workspace users; ChatGPT and Claude are more platform-agnostic. Microsoft Copilot adds another option for Windows and Office users but is a separate product from ChatGPT.

Impact on Workflows

Teams that standardize on one assistant often do so for cost control, compliance, or training. Enterprises may prefer Claude or Gemini for data residency and contract terms; consumers and small teams often mix free tiers and one paid subscription. Support and documentation quality vary: OpenAI and Google have larger developer communities; Anthropic is known for detailed model cards and safety documentation.

What's Next

All three vendors ship model updates every few months. Expect more agentic behavior (multi-step tasks, tool use), better reasoning modes, and tighter integration with calendars, email, and productivity apps. Price and capability gaps will continue to shift; re-evaluating once or twice a year is enough for most users. For a final choice, trying the free tiers of all three remains the fastest way to see which fits your workflow.

Tags

chatgpt claude gemini ai assistants openai anthropic google

Related Articles